Saturday, October 10, 2009

Gaza: The Forgotten Story [I]

By Aditya Ganapathiraju

Why are people on Gaza so unhappy? Well, if you had to live in a prison, wouldn't you be unhappy?— Former CIA officer Robert Baer[1]

It’s the most terrifying place I’ve ever been in… it’s a horrifyingly sad place because of the desperation and misery of the way people live. I was unprepared for camps that are much worse than anything I saw in South Africa.– Professor Edward Said 1993[2]

They may be living but they're not alive. – Journalist Philip Rizk[3]

The situation on the ground in Gaza has continued to deteriorate since January. One of the most densely populated areas in the world, this small coastal strip is home to a million and a half Palestinians, many of them refugees for over 60 years. It is now the worst condition it’s been in since 1967 when the Israeli army took military control of the land.[4]

As numerous scholars and observers have concluded, the Israeli plan for Gaza seems to be to turn it into a depoliticized humanitarian catastrophe,[5] turning the Palestinians trapped in there “beggars who have no political identity and therefore can have no political claims.”[6]

The Israeli assault against Gaza last winter brought this enclave to the forefront of the news cycle, only to disappear from the headlines in the weeks and months that followed. The attention of much of the world’s dominant media moved on to other issues soon after a unilateral Israeli pullout—planned precisely timed so as not to cause an unsightly distraction from the inauguration of the new American president.

The lack of prominent coverage was not because there was a lack of newsworthy events in Gaza. No, “breaking news is Gaza's middle name,” says freelance journalist Philip Rizk. “But because this breaking news always holds the same kind of information, no one cares to report on it.”[7]

“An Eye for an Eyelash”[8]

Violence in the occupied territories has always been bloody but many longtime observers were shocked by the brutality of winter assault,[9] which killed more Palestinians in the first three weeks than during the entire first Intifada, or uprising against the occupation (1987-1993), prompting the UN to label it “one of the most violent episodes in the recent history of the occupied Palestinian territory.”[10]

The January offensive left 1,417 people dead, 1,181 of which were non-combatants (313 children and 116 women). Another 5,303 Palestinians were injured in the attacks, including 1,606 children and 828 women, many left devastated with life-altering conditions.[11]

The attack, carefully-planned six months in advance,[12] destroyed 60 police stations early on, obliterated 20 ambulances and 30 mosques, in addition to leaving several hospitals bombed. Some 280 schools and kindergartens were damaged, 18 of which were destroyed completely (including 8 kindergartens).[13]

Another 6600 dunams of agricultural land, which Palestinian farmers depend on for their livelihood, were razed (1 dunam=1,000 square meters). In all, some 21,000 buildings were damaged or destroyed. An estimated $1.9 billion worth of damage was inflicted, according to an Economist Intelligence Unit report.[14]

“What we're witnessing today is an assault, a massacre,” and “not a war whatsoever,” said Zahir Janmohamed of Amnesty International on the 15 of January, reminding an audience that this was not a conflict between two equivalent military powers but rather another bloody chapter a long history of “Israel’s colonial operations” in the occupied territories.[15] His views were confirmed by facts on the ground, as one scholar recently observed.[16]

The systemic and widespread destruction of both lives and infrastructure was not an unintended consequence of the offensive but rather a deliberate strategy derived from the destruction inflicted during the 2006 Lebanon conflict.[17]

The attack followed the “Dahiya Strategy,” referring to the Beirut area that was destroyed during the attack on Lebanon in 2006. It concluded civilians must pay for their leader’s actions.[18]

The strategy was formalized two months before the attacks by Tel Aviv University's Institute of National Security Studies and urged the use of “disproportionate force” ( by definition a war crime) to inflict crushing damage on “economic interests” and “centers of civilian power,” leaving the targeted society devastated and “floundering” in a long reconstruction process.[19] (for more on the political dynamics involved and actions of Hamas and Israel before and during the attacks, see these papers[20]).

“Behind the dry statistics lie shocking individual stories,” a group of Israeli human rights groups wrote. “Whole families were killed; parents saw their children shot before their very eyes; relatives watched their loved ones bleed to death; and entire neighborhoods were obliterated.”[21]

The stories of those who experienced the attacks, who lost loved ones, and who continue to suffer, offer another perspective often absent here in the U.S. Some of these stories, which described the toll of war beyond numerical abstractions, trickled out in the British press, where journalists are less ideologically constrained to follow the party line, even despite the Israeli military ban on foreign journalists.[22]

Anwar Balousha, a 40-year-old man living in Jabalyia refugee camp in northern Gaza told British reporters of his personal loss. It was around midnight when an Israeli bomb struck their refugee camp’s mosque with a blast so powerful it collapsed several neighboring buildings, including the Balousha’s home. Of his seven daughters sleeping in a single room, five were killed—buried under bricks and rubble as they slept.

"We are civilians,” Anwar said. “I don't belong to any faction, I don't support Fatah or Hamas, I'm just a Palestinian. They are punishing us all, civilians and militants. What is the guilt of the civilian?"[23]

While human rights groups and other observers painstakingly extracted similar stories, the lesser-known narrative of a siege decimating Gaza’s society remained largely untold, confined to the dissident press and humanitarian groups.[24]

Most stories usually report on the violence and bloodshed between two forces, which are often implied to be equivalent both morally and physically. The day-to-day struggles of 1.4 million Palestinians enduring and resisting a 42-year old occupation do not fit neatly into the standard narrative of events describing the Palestinian-Israeli issue. It becomes easy for many to see ordinary Palestinians as nameless and faceless creatures, characters in a story taking place in a faraway land.

Israeli violence towards Gaza did not begin on the 27th of December. As Amnety’s Janmohamed observed, the assault included the blockade and other attacks and incursions into Gaza, all of which started well before that Saturday morning in December.[25] The roots of the humanitarian disaster imposed by the Israeli need to be examined, he said, alluding to what one OXFAM official described as “a serious crime against humanity,”[26] a situation where 1.5 million people “are being punished for something they haven't done.”[27]

[This is the first part of a series on Gaza, Part II describes life under siege]

1. ‘U.S. and Iran Share an Equal Monopoly on Violence,’” Inter Press Service, January 23, 2009

2. Edwards Said and David Barsamian ,The Pen and the Sword, Common Courage Press, 1994, page 99

3. “'Gaza wears a face of misery,' Adam Makary, Al Jazeera” April 4, 2009

4. UN: Gaza in worst condition since 1967” Ynet,,2506,L-3773955,00.html

5. Israel wanted a humanitarian crisis” Ben White, Guardian, January 20, 2009

6. If Gaza falls . . .”Sara Roy, the London Review of Books, January 1, 2009

7. “'Gaza wears a face of misery,' Adam Makary, Al Jazeera” April 4, 2009

8. How Israel brought Gaza to the brink of humanitarian catastrophe” Avi Shlaim, Guardian, January 7, 2009

9. Avi Shlaim, Guardian:

“On 2 June 1948, Sir John Troutbeck wrote to the foreign secretary, Ernest Bevin, that the Americans were responsible for the creation of a gangster state headed by "an utterly unscrupulous set of leaders". I used to think that this judgment was too harsh but Israel's vicious assault on the people of Gaza, and the Bush administration's complicity in this assault, have reopened the question.”

Leading Israeli Scholar Avi Shlaim: Israel Committing “State Terror” in Gaza Attack, Preventing Peace,” Democracy Now!, January 14, 2009

10. UN OCHA Report “Locked In:The humanitarian impact of two years of blockade on the Gaza Strip” footnote 36

11. Palestinian Center for Human Rights Press Release March 12, 2009

12. “Disinformation, secrecy and lies: How the Gaza offensive came about” Haaretz, Barak Ravid “IAF strike followed months of planning” Barak Ravid

13. UN OCHA Report “Locked In”

14. Palestinian Center for Human Rights Press Release

15. “The Gaza Offensive and the Laws of War with Zahir Janmohamed,” The Palestine Center January 23, 2009

16. “UN Inquiry Finds Israel “Punished and Terrorized” Palestinian Civilians, Committed Acts of War During Gaza Assault, Democracy Now! September 16, 2009

17. Israel's Bombing Campaign Will "Send Gaza Back Decades" Jonathan Cook, January 22, 2009

18. The Dahiya strategy: Israel finally realizes that Arabs should be accountable for their leaders’ acts,” Ynet,, 6 Oct 2008,7340,L-3605863,00.html

19. Disproportionate Force: Israel’s Concept of Response in Light of the Second Lebanon War” Institute of National Security Studies, Insight No. 74,, 2 October 2008

20. “Behind the Headlines of the Gaza Attacks” Aditya Ganapathiraju ZNet

“Foiling Another Palestinian “Peace Offensive”: Behind the bloodbath in Gaza” Norman Finkelstein January 19, 2009

21. The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories

22. Robert Fisk: Why do they hate the West so much, we will ask” Independent

Robert Fisk: When journalists refuse to tell the truth about Israel” Independent

Robert Fisk: Keeping out the cameras and reporters simply doesn't work” Independent

Foreign reporters dub Israel 'military dictatorship'” Ynet,7340,L-3653154,00.html

23. 'I didn't see any of my girls, just a pile of bricks'” Guardian, December 30, 2008

24. “Israel declares Gaza "enemy entity" (19 September 2007)” Electronic Intifada

25. “The Gaza Offensive and the Laws of War with Zahir Janmohamed,” The Palestine Center January 23, 2009

26. Gaza: A humanitarian implosion: A report from eight UK human rights organizations says situation in Gaza worst since 1967” The Real News March 6, 2008

27. “New Report Finds Gaza Humanitarian Situation is Worst in 40 years” Voice of America News March 6, 2008

1 comment:

Yesh Prabhu said...

These three articles by journalist Mr. Aditya Ganapathiraju represent the finest examples of good journalism: powerful articles that provoke, and move the hearts and minds of readers, and force the readers to stop and think and ponder and wonder, and feel astonished that the world has not yet succeeded in plodding Israel to lift the blockade of Gaza. After reading these three articles, a fair-minded reader can not help but wonder why the new Nobel Peace Laureate in the White House has not done much to relieve the suffering of the children of Gaza, and why he hasn’t asked Netanyahu to allow the basic materials needed for survival. Has the world become blind to the plight of the Palestinians? Has the White House become deaf to the wails of the Children of Gaza? Is there any person with a beating heart who will remain unmoved after reading these three articles? These three articles are: The Gaza Chronicles: Part 1 – The Forgotten Story; The Gaza Chronicles: Part 2 – What a Siege Looks Like; and The Gaza Chronicles: Part 3 – Shattered Mind And The Children Of Gaza.

I hope these three articles, together as a group, would be nominated for a prestigious international journalism award. I hope the editors and publishers of major magazines would nominate them for the awards. These articles deserve international recognition.

I have been wondering since the arrival of fall here in New Jersey, and the nights have been getting colder by each passing day, how the destitute and ill-equipped people of Gaza will survive the bitter cold winter of Gaza. I shiver even in my sheltered home, and I wonder how will the Gazans survive in drafty, leaking tents that provide so little shelter? None of the houses bombed by Israel in Gaza has been rebuilt because of Israel’s embargo of building materials. I have not heard President Obama talk about Israel’s embargo of even basic materials necessary for survival, and I now wonder whether he will intervene and ask Netanyahu to lift the embargo. From what I have observed, it seems to me that President Obama’s ears are quite open to Netanyahu’s arrogant words, but they are shut to the cries of the Palestinians’ suffering children.

Thank you very much, Mr. Aditya Ganapathiraju, for writing these articles. I can not describe in words how much moved I was when I read these articles. As I read these articles I thought of the great Indian writer Arundhati Roy. She is also well known for her powerful prose.

Yesh Prabhu, Plainsboro, NJ